Role of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Restraining Internal Tibial Rotation: In Vitro Biomechanical Assessment of Lateral Tissue Engagement.

BACKGROUND: The way in which force increases in the anterolateral tissues and the lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) tissue to resist internal rotation (IR) of the tibia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in isolation and after LET augmentation, respectively, is not well understood. PURPOSE: (1) To compare in a cadaveric model how force increases (ie, engages) in the anterolateral tissues with IR of the tibia after isolated ACL reconstruction and in the LET tissue after augmentation of the ACL reconstruction with LET and (2) to determine whether IR of the tibia is related to engagement of the LET tissue. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: IR moments were applied to 9 human cadaveric knees at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion using a robotic manipulator. Each knee was tested in 2 states: (1) after isolated ACL reconstruction with intact anterolateral tissues and (2) after LET was performed using a modified Lemaire technique with the LET tissue fixed at 60° of flexion under 44 N of tension. Resultant forces carried by the anterolateral tissues and the LET tissue were determined via superposition. The way force increased in these tissues was characterized via parameters of tissue engagement, namely in situ slack, in situ stiffness, and tissue force at peak applied IR moment, and then compared (α < .05). IR was related to parameters of engagement of the LET tissue via simple linear regression (α < .05). RESULTS: The LET tissue exhibited less in situ slack than the anterolateral tissues at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion (P≤ .04) and greater in situ stiffness at 30° and 90° of flexion (P≤ .043). The LET tissue carried greater force at the peak applied IR moment at 0° and 30° of flexion (P≤ .01). IR was related to the in situ slack of the LET tissue (R2≥ 0.88; P≤ .0003). CONCLUSION: LET increased restraint to IR of the tibia compared with the anterolateral tissue, particularly at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. IR of the tibia was positively associated with in situ slack of the LET tissue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fixing the LET at 60° of flexion still provided IR restraint in the more functionally relevant flexion angle of 30°. Surgeons should pay close attention to the angle of internal and/or external tibial rotation when fixing the LET tissue intraoperatively because this surgical parameter is related to in situ slack of the LET tissue and, therefore, the amount of IR of the tibia.

Posterior-stabilized versus mid-level constraint polyethylene components in total knee arthroplasty.

Aims: Mid-level constraint designs for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are intended to reduce coronal plane laxity. Our aims were to compare kinematics and ligament forces of the Zimmer Biomet Persona posterior-stabilized (PS) and mid-level designs in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes under loads simulating clinical exams of the knee in a cadaver model. Methods: We performed TKA on eight cadaveric knees and loaded them using a robotic manipulator. We tested both PS and mid-level designs under loads simulating clinical exams via applied varus and valgus moments, internal-external (IE) rotation moments, and anteroposterior forces at 0°, 30°, and 90° of flexion. We measured the resulting tibiofemoral angulations and translations. We also quantified the forces carried by the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL/LCL) via serial sectioning of these structures and use of the principle of superposition. Results: Mid-level inserts reduced varus angulations compared to PS inserts by a median of 0.4°, 0.9°, and 1.5° at 0°, 30°, and 90° of flexion, respectively, and reduced valgus angulations by a median of 0.3°, 1.0°, and 1.2° (p ≤ 0.027 for all comparisons). Mid-level inserts reduced net IE rotations by a median of 5.6°, 14.7°, and 17.5° at 0°, 30°, and 90°, respectively (p = 0.012). Mid-level inserts reduced anterior tibial translation only at 90° of flexion by a median of 3.0 millimetres (p = 0.036). With an applied varus moment, the mid-level insert decreased LCL force compared to the PS insert at all three flexion angles that were tested (p ≤ 0.036). In contrast, with a valgus moment the mid-level insert did not reduce MCL force. With an applied internal rotation moment, the mid-level insert decreased LCL force at 30° and 90° by a median of 25.7 N and 31.7 N, respectively (p = 0.017 and p = 0.012). With an external rotation moment, the mid-level insert decreased MCL force at 30° and 90° by a median of 45.7 N and 20.0 N, respectively (p ≤ 0.017 for all comparisons). With an applied anterior load, MCL and LCL forces showed no differences between the two inserts at 30° and 90° of flexion. Conclusion: The mid-level insert used in this study decreased coronal and axial plane laxities compared to the PS insert, but its stabilizing benefit in the sagittal plane was limited. Both mid-level and PS inserts depended on the MCL to resist anterior loads during a simulated clinical exam of anterior laxity.

Bayesian Calibration of Computational Knee Models to Estimate Subject-Specific Ligament Properties, Tibiofemoral Kinematics, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force With Uncertainty Quantification.

High-grade knee laxity is associated with early anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure, poor function, and compromised clinical outcome. Yet, the specific ligaments and ligament properties driving knee laxity remain poorly understood. We described a Bayesian calibration methodology for predicting unknown ligament properties in a computational knee model. Then, we applied the method to estimate unknown ligament properties with uncertainty bounds using tibiofemoral kinematics and ACL force measurements from two cadaver knees that spanned a range of laxities; these knees were tested using a robotic manipulator. The unknown ligament properties were from the Bayesian set of plausible ligament properties, as specified by their posterior distribution. Finally, we developed a calibrated predictor of tibiofemoral kinematics and ACL force with their own uncertainty bounds. The calibrated predictor was developed by first collecting the posterior draws of the kinematics and ACL force that are induced by the posterior draws of the ligament properties and model parameters. Bayesian calibration identified unique ligament slack lengths for the two knee models and produced ACL force and kinematic predictions that were closer to the corresponding in vitro measurement than those from a standard optimization technique. This Bayesian framework quantifies uncertainty in both ligament properties and model outputs; an important step towards developing subject-specific computational models to improve treatment for ACL injury.

Novel Arthrometer for Quantifying In Vivo Knee Laxity in Three Planes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Knee instability is a leading cause of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Instability can involve abnormal laxity in multiple directions including varus-valgus (VV) angulation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and internal-external rotation (IER). No existing arthrometer objectively quantifies knee laxity in all three of these directions. The study objectives were to verify the safety and assess reliability of a novel multiplanar arthrometer. METHODS: The arthrometer utilized a five degree-of-freedom instrumented linkage. Two examiners each conducted two tests on the leg that had received a TKA of 20 patients (mean age 65 years (range, 53-75); 9 men, 11 women), with nine and eleven distinct patients tested at 3-month and 1-year postoperative time points, respectively. AP forces from -10 to 30 Newtons, VV moments of ±3 Newton-meters, and IER moments of ±2.5 Newton-meters were applied to each subject's replaced knee. Severity and location of knee pain during testing were assessed using a visual analog scale. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities were characterized using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: All subjects successfully completed testing. Pain during testing averaged 0.7 (out of possible 10; range, 0-2.5). Intraexaminer reliability was >0.77 for all loading directions and examiners. Interexaminer reliability and 95% confidence intervals were 0.85 (0.66-0.94), 0.67 (0.35-0.85), and 0.54 (0.16-0.79) in the VV, IER, and AP directions, respectively. CONCLUSION: The novel arthrometer was safe for evaluating AP, VV, and IER laxities in subjects who had received TKA. This device could be used to examine relationships between laxity and patient perceptions of knee instability.

Anterior cruciate ligament graft forces are sensitive to fixation angle and tunnel position within the native femoral footprint during passive flexion.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft position within the anatomic femoral footprint of the native ACL and the flexion angle at which the graft is fixed (i.e., fixation angle) are important considerations in ACL reconstruction surgery. However, their combined effect on ACL graft force remains less well understood. HYPOTHESIS: During passive flexion, grafts placed high within the femoral footprint carry lower forces than grafts placed low within the femoral footprint (i.e., high and low grafts, respectively). Forces carried by high grafts are independent of fixation angle. All reconstructions impart higher forces on the graft than those carried by the native ACL. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted to a robotic manipulator and flexed from full extension to 90° of flexion. The ACL was sectioned and ACL force was calculated via superposition. ACL reconstructions were then performed using a patellar tendon autograft. For each knee, four different reconstruction permutations were tested: high and low femoral graft positions fixed at 15° and at 30° of flexion. Graft forces were calculated from full extension to 90° of flexion for each combination of femoral graft position and fixation angle again via superposition. Native ACL and ACL graft forces were compared through early flexion (by averaging tissue force from 0 to 30° of flexion) and in 5° increments from full extension to 90° of flexion. RESULTS: When fixed at 30° of flexion, high grafts carried less force than low grafts through early flexion bearing a respective 64 ± 19 N and 88 ± 11 N (p = 0.02). Increasing fixation angle from 15° to 30° caused graft forces through early flexion to increase 40 ± 13 N in low grafts and 23 ± 6 N in high grafts (p < 0.001). Low grafts fixed at 30° of flexion differed most from the native ACL, carrying 67 ± 9 N more force through early flexion (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ACL grafts placed high within the femoral footprint and fixed at a lower flexion angle carried less force through passive flexion compared to grafts placed lower within the femoral footprint and fixed at a higher flexion angle. At the prescribed pretensions, all grafts carried higher forces than the native ACL through passive flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both fixation angle and femoral graft location within the anatomic ACL footprint influence graft forces and, therefore, should be considered when performing ACL reconstruction.